Homes rented privately
7.7% to 23.3%
Homes rented privately ranged from 7.7% in Euxton to 23.3% in Chorley North West — a gap of 15.5 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 14 of 14 current wards with comparable figures.
A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
Homes rented privately · 21 March 2021| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|
| Euxton | 7.7% | 251 | 3,244 |
|---|
| Clayton West & Cuerden | 8.4% | 314 | 3,716 |
|---|
| Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard | 8.9% | 279 | 3,147 |
|---|
| Chorley North East | 9.8% | 293 | 3,005 |
|---|
| Clayton East, Brindle & Hoghton | 11.3% | 451 | 3,996 |
|---|
| Croston, Mawdesley & Euxton South | 12.1% | 390 | 3,212 |
|---|
| Coppull | 13% | 460 | 3,540 |
|---|
| Chorley South East & Heath Charnock | 13.5% | 545 | 4,033 |
|---|
| Chorley North & Astley | 13.6% | 491 | 3,614 |
|---|
| Chorley South West | 15.4% | 545 | 3,539 |
|---|
| Adlington & Anderton | 15.5% | 543 | 3,506 |
|---|
| Buckshaw & Whittle | 18.2% | 752 | 4,129 |
|---|
| Chorley East | 21% | 789 | 3,749 |
|---|
| Chorley North West | 23.3% | 862 | 3,704 |
|---|
Source and method → What could respond to this pattern →People reporting bad or very bad health
3.4% to 6.3%
People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 3.4% in Buckshaw & Whittle to 6.3% in Chorley North & Astley — a gap of 3 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 14 of 14 current wards with comparable figures.
Residents described their own health. Differences in age matter, so this is a prompt to investigate needs, not a score for local health services.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
People reporting bad or very bad health · 21 March 2021| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|
| Buckshaw & Whittle | 3.4% | 339 | 10,088 |
|---|
| Chorley North East | 3.6% | 252 | 6,984 |
|---|
| Euxton | 4% | 305 | 7,686 |
|---|
| Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard | 4.1% | 297 | 7,255 |
|---|
| Adlington & Anderton | 4.6% | 360 | 7,902 |
|---|
| Clayton West & Cuerden | 4.6% | 402 | 8,726 |
|---|
| Chorley South East & Heath Charnock | 5.6% | 524 | 9,435 |
|---|
| Croston, Mawdesley & Euxton South | 5.8% | 558 | 9,552 |
|---|
| Chorley North West | 5.9% | 454 | 7,754 |
|---|
| Chorley South West | 5.9% | 500 | 8,530 |
|---|
| Coppull | 5.9% | 491 | 8,300 |
|---|
| Clayton East, Brindle & Hoghton | 6.3% | 573 | 9,100 |
|---|
| Chorley East | 6.3% | 536 | 8,468 |
|---|
| Chorley North & Astley | 6.3% | 505 | 7,955 |
|---|
Source and method → What could respond to this pattern →People aged 65 or over
11.1% to 27.3%
People aged 65 or over ranged from 11.1% in Buckshaw & Whittle to 27.3% in Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard — a gap of 16.3 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 14 of 14 current wards with comparable figures.
Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
People aged 65 or over · 21 March 2021| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|
| Buckshaw & Whittle | 11.1% | 1,115 | 10,090 |
|---|
| Chorley South West | 14.2% | 1,215 | 8,530 |
|---|
| Chorley East | 16.4% | 1,384 | 8,464 |
|---|
| Clayton East, Brindle & Hoghton | 19.9% | 1,812 | 9,099 |
|---|
| Chorley South East & Heath Charnock | 20.2% | 1,904 | 9,435 |
|---|
| Coppull | 21% | 1,741 | 8,298 |
|---|
| Chorley North East | 21.5% | 1,503 | 6,983 |
|---|
| Clayton West & Cuerden | 21.8% | 1,899 | 8,727 |
|---|
| Croston, Mawdesley & Euxton South | 22.1% | 2,112 | 9,552 |
|---|
| Adlington & Anderton | 22.6% | 1,783 | 7,902 |
|---|
| Euxton | 23.4% | 1,800 | 7,685 |
|---|
| Chorley North & Astley | 24.1% | 1,915 | 7,954 |
|---|
| Chorley North West | 25.1% | 1,947 | 7,753 |
|---|
| Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard | 27.3% | 1,981 | 7,254 |
|---|
Source and method → What could respond to this pattern →People aged 16+ with no qualifications
9.8% to 21.6%
People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 9.8% in Buckshaw & Whittle to 21.6% in Chorley East — a gap of 11.8 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 14 of 14 current wards with comparable figures.
Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
People aged 16+ with no qualifications · 21 March 2021| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|
| Buckshaw & Whittle | 9.8% | 755 | 7,682 |
|---|
| Chorley North East | 10.2% | 598 | 5,849 |
|---|
| Euxton | 13.3% | 841 | 6,339 |
|---|
| Clayton West & Cuerden | 13.3% | 945 | 7,113 |
|---|
| Adlington & Anderton | 15.4% | 1,007 | 6,540 |
|---|
| Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard | 15.5% | 944 | 6,091 |
|---|
| Croston, Mawdesley & Euxton South | 15.7% | 1,290 | 8,216 |
|---|
| Clayton East, Brindle & Hoghton | 16.5% | 1,234 | 7,467 |
|---|
| Chorley South East & Heath Charnock | 17.4% | 1,338 | 7,668 |
|---|
| Chorley North West | 17.6% | 1,152 | 6,549 |
|---|
| Chorley South West | 17.6% | 1,181 | 6,705 |
|---|
| Chorley North & Astley | 19% | 1,252 | 6,585 |
|---|
| Coppull | 20.9% | 1,424 | 6,805 |
|---|
| Chorley East | 21.6% | 1,461 | 6,757 |
|---|
Source and method → What could respond to this pattern →People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent
24.8% to 44.4%
People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent ranged from 24.8% in Chorley East to 44.4% in Chorley North East — a gap of 19.6 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 14 of 14 current wards with comparable figures.
Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent · 21 March 2021| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|
| Chorley East | 24.8% | 1,677 | 6,757 |
|---|
| Coppull | 26.2% | 1,783 | 6,805 |
|---|
| Chorley South West | 30% | 2,011 | 6,705 |
|---|
| Chorley North & Astley | 30.1% | 1,984 | 6,585 |
|---|
| Chorley North West | 31.6% | 2,069 | 6,549 |
|---|
| Chorley South East & Heath Charnock | 32.3% | 2,475 | 7,668 |
|---|
| Clayton East, Brindle & Hoghton | 33.1% | 2,468 | 7,467 |
|---|
| Adlington & Anderton | 33.2% | 2,171 | 6,540 |
|---|
| Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard | 34.6% | 2,105 | 6,091 |
|---|
| Euxton | 35.6% | 2,255 | 6,339 |
|---|
| Croston, Mawdesley & Euxton South | 35.8% | 2,945 | 8,216 |
|---|
| Clayton West & Cuerden | 37.7% | 2,684 | 7,113 |
|---|
| Buckshaw & Whittle | 44.1% | 3,390 | 7,682 |
|---|
| Chorley North East | 44.4% | 2,596 | 5,849 |
|---|
Source and method → What could respond to this pattern →Households facing two or more measured disadvantages
8.6% to 22.6%
Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 8.6% in Chorley North East to 22.6% in Chorley East — a gap of 14 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 14 of 14 current wards with comparable figures.
These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
Households facing two or more measured disadvantages · 21 March 2021| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|
| Chorley North East | 8.6% | 259 | 3,004 |
|---|
| Buckshaw & Whittle | 9.7% | 400 | 4,133 |
|---|
| Croston, Mawdesley & Euxton South | 10.3% | 331 | 3,211 |
|---|
| Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard | 11.1% | 350 | 3,146 |
|---|
| Clayton West & Cuerden | 11.4% | 423 | 3,714 |
|---|
| Euxton | 11.7% | 378 | 3,244 |
|---|
| Adlington & Anderton | 14% | 491 | 3,506 |
|---|
| Chorley North West | 15.9% | 588 | 3,704 |
|---|
| Chorley South East & Heath Charnock | 17% | 684 | 4,031 |
|---|
| Clayton East, Brindle & Hoghton | 17.2% | 688 | 3,996 |
|---|
| Chorley South West | 18.3% | 647 | 3,540 |
|---|
| Coppull | 18.9% | 670 | 3,537 |
|---|
| Chorley North & Astley | 19.6% | 708 | 3,614 |
|---|
| Chorley East | 22.6% | 846 | 3,748 |
|---|
Source and method → What could respond to this pattern →Homes rented from a council or housing association
5.9% to 26.6%
Homes rented from a council or housing association ranged from 5.9% in Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard to 26.6% in Clayton East, Brindle & Hoghton — a gap of 20.7 percentage points.
21 March 2021 · 14 of 14 current wards with comparable figures.
The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.
See each ward and the workings
These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.
Homes rented from a council or housing association · 21 March 2021| Ward | Share | Count | Population or households covered |
|---|
| Eccleston, Heskin & Charnock Richard | 5.9% | 187 | 3,147 |
|---|
| Croston, Mawdesley & Euxton South | 6.4% | 207 | 3,212 |
|---|
| Euxton | 6.5% | 211 | 3,244 |
|---|
| Chorley North East | 7% | 209 | 3,005 |
|---|
| Clayton West & Cuerden | 7.6% | 283 | 3,716 |
|---|
| Buckshaw & Whittle | 8.2% | 337 | 4,129 |
|---|
| Adlington & Anderton | 9.6% | 337 | 3,506 |
|---|
| Chorley North West | 10.1% | 374 | 3,704 |
|---|
| Chorley South East & Heath Charnock | 12.8% | 518 | 4,033 |
|---|
| Coppull | 13.6% | 483 | 3,540 |
|---|
| Chorley East | 19.7% | 737 | 3,749 |
|---|
| Chorley South West | 22.7% | 803 | 3,539 |
|---|
| Chorley North & Astley | 24.5% | 887 | 3,614 |
|---|
| Clayton East, Brindle & Hoghton | 26.6% | 1,064 | 3,996 |
|---|
Source and method → What could respond to this pattern →