Wyre, in numbers

Your area: Wyre

Wyre local authority area. Every figure carries its own date.

Neighbourhood differences

Homes rented privately

10.1% to 46.4%

Homes rented privately ranged from 10.1% in Pheasant's Wood to 46.4% in Pharos — a gap of 36.2 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 24 of 24 current wards with comparable figures.

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented privately · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Pheasant's Wood	10.1%	78	770
Pilling	10.4%	112	1,076
Stanah	11%	223	2,022
Carleton	11.2%	225	2,001
Hardhorn with High Cross	11.3%	320	2,826
Hambleton & Stalmine	11.8%	247	2,099
Great Eccleston	11.9%	222	1,862
Rossall	12.2%	315	2,590
Calder	12.3%	123	996
Garstang	13.2%	427	3,235
Warren	14.4%	287	1,991
Brock with Catterall	15%	293	1,950
Cleveleys Park	15.9%	351	2,213
Park	16.8%	349	2,081
Preesall	17.1%	466	2,724
Marsh Mill	17.3%	521	3,003
Wyresdale	17.8%	171	961
Tithebarn	19.3%	400	2,073
Victoria & Norcross	19.9%	400	2,015
Breck	21%	438	2,083
Bourne	23%	678	2,948
Mount	24.9%	585	2,349
Jubilee	34.7%	795	2,288
Pharos	46.4%	1,209	2,608

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People reporting bad or very bad health

3.3% to 11.5%

People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 3.3% in Brock with Catterall to 11.5% in Pharos — a gap of 8.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 24 of 24 current wards with comparable figures.

Residents described their own health. Differences in age matter, so this is a prompt to investigate needs, not a score for local health services.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People reporting bad or very bad health · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Brock with Catterall	3.3%	166	4,979
Pheasant's Wood	3.9%	73	1,850
Great Eccleston	4.4%	193	4,365
Wyresdale	4.7%	109	2,335
Carleton	4.7%	208	4,432
Calder	4.9%	120	2,426
Hardhorn with High Cross	5.3%	321	6,049
Pilling	5.7%	149	2,629
Tithebarn	5.7%	243	4,285
Stanah	6%	273	4,582
Victoria & Norcross	6.1%	265	4,364
Garstang	6.1%	404	6,616
Bourne	6.2%	409	6,620
Hambleton & Stalmine	6.3%	293	4,640
Breck	6.7%	308	4,569
Warren	6.9%	334	4,815
Mount	7.6%	393	5,143
Marsh Mill	7.9%	492	6,216
Preesall	8.3%	469	5,656
Cleveleys Park	9.1%	412	4,525
Park	9.5%	475	4,978
Jubilee	9.6%	442	4,584
Rossall	9.9%	603	6,120
Pharos	11.5%	592	5,170

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 65 or over

18.5% to 38.6%

People aged 65 or over ranged from 18.5% in Pharos to 38.6% in Garstang — a gap of 20.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 24 of 24 current wards with comparable figures.

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 65 or over · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Pharos	18.5%	958	5,173
Bourne	18.7%	1,238	6,620
Brock with Catterall	19.1%	948	4,976
Park	19.2%	955	4,978
Mount	21.4%	1,101	5,142
Pheasant's Wood	22.9%	423	1,847
Warren	24%	1,158	4,817
Great Eccleston	24.1%	1,053	4,364
Victoria & Norcross	26.3%	1,147	4,365
Wyresdale	26.3%	615	2,334
Breck	26.5%	1,212	4,572
Calder	26.6%	646	2,427
Pilling	28.2%	740	2,627
Carleton	28.4%	1,260	4,429
Tithebarn	28.7%	1,229	4,284
Rossall	29.5%	1,807	6,121
Stanah	29.6%	1,358	4,583
Hardhorn with High Cross	30%	1,816	6,048
Marsh Mill	32.5%	2,020	6,218
Jubilee	32.5%	1,491	4,584
Hambleton & Stalmine	33.1%	1,538	4,642
Cleveleys Park	36.1%	1,634	4,525
Preesall	37.1%	2,100	5,656
Garstang	38.6%	2,554	6,616

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

11.9% to 27.4%

People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 11.9% in Calder to 27.4% in Rossall — a gap of 15.5 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 24 of 24 current wards with comparable figures.

Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with no qualifications · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Calder	11.9%	245	2,056
Brock with Catterall	12.4%	508	4,109
Carleton	13.3%	504	3,778
Great Eccleston	14.2%	517	3,644
Hardhorn with High Cross	14.3%	747	5,210
Pheasant's Wood	15%	234	1,560
Breck	15%	569	3,785
Tithebarn	15.6%	577	3,687
Victoria & Norcross	16.4%	613	3,739
Wyresdale	16.7%	330	1,980
Stanah	16.8%	656	3,911
Bourne	16.9%	895	5,302
Pilling	17.2%	377	2,196
Hambleton & Stalmine	19.5%	771	3,964
Marsh Mill	20.8%	1,120	5,385
Garstang	21.5%	1,241	5,778
Mount	23.9%	991	4,141
Preesall	24.3%	1,199	4,938
Warren	24.7%	958	3,884
Jubilee	25.6%	1,019	3,977
Park	25.7%	1,015	3,951
Cleveleys Park	26%	1,034	3,979
Pharos	27.2%	1,181	4,334
Rossall	27.4%	1,389	5,061

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

18.5% to 42.1%

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent ranged from 18.5% in Park to 42.1% in Calder — a gap of 23.6 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 24 of 24 current wards with comparable figures.

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Park	18.5%	730	3,951
Pharos	19.2%	832	4,334
Rossall	19.6%	994	5,061
Warren	20.9%	812	3,884
Cleveleys Park	21.2%	844	3,979
Mount	22.5%	930	4,141
Jubilee	23.3%	925	3,977
Preesall	24.5%	1,210	4,938
Marsh Mill	25.4%	1,366	5,385
Bourne	26.3%	1,396	5,302
Pheasant's Wood	29.2%	455	1,560
Stanah	29.2%	1,141	3,911
Hambleton & Stalmine	29.8%	1,181	3,964
Pilling	30.1%	662	2,196
Garstang	31.3%	1,807	5,778
Victoria & Norcross	31.7%	1,187	3,739
Brock with Catterall	33.2%	1,366	4,109
Tithebarn	33.8%	1,247	3,687
Hardhorn with High Cross	35%	1,821	5,210
Carleton	35.6%	1,346	3,778
Great Eccleston	37%	1,349	3,644
Breck	37.8%	1,432	3,785
Wyresdale	39.4%	780	1,980
Calder	42.1%	865	2,056

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

8.2% to 35.4%

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 8.2% in Calder to 35.4% in Pharos — a gap of 27.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 24 of 24 current wards with comparable figures.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Calder	8.2%	82	996
Brock with Catterall	10.1%	198	1,951
Wyresdale	10.7%	103	960
Pheasant's Wood	12.2%	94	770
Carleton	12.2%	245	2,002
Great Eccleston	12.5%	232	1,862
Hardhorn with High Cross	12.5%	354	2,826
Tithebarn	14.2%	294	2,073
Stanah	14.3%	288	2,021
Breck	14.8%	307	2,079
Pilling	15.3%	164	1,074
Victoria & Norcross	15.6%	314	2,014
Garstang	15.7%	509	3,235
Hambleton & Stalmine	15.9%	333	2,099
Marsh Mill	18.1%	545	3,006
Bourne	18.5%	545	2,947
Preesall	20.8%	567	2,724
Warren	22.8%	455	1,995
Cleveleys Park	23.5%	519	2,213
Mount	25.4%	596	2,351
Jubilee	26.4%	604	2,288
Rossall	29.3%	759	2,589
Park	31.9%	665	2,083
Pharos	35.4%	924	2,613

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

0.9% to 29.5%

Homes rented from a council or housing association ranged from 0.9% in Pheasant's Wood to 29.5% in Park — a gap of 28.6 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 24 of 24 current wards with comparable figures.

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented from a council or housing association · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Pheasant's Wood	0.9%	7	770
Victoria & Norcross	1.2%	25	2,015
Stanah	1.9%	39	2,022
Carleton	2.4%	48	2,001
Jubilee	2.8%	65	2,288
Tithebarn	3.4%	71	2,073
Marsh Mill	3.6%	108	3,003
Hambleton & Stalmine	4%	83	2,099
Hardhorn with High Cross	4.4%	124	2,826
Preesall	4.9%	133	2,724
Wyresdale	5%	48	961
Great Eccleston	5.6%	104	1,862
Calder	5.9%	59	996
Garstang	6.4%	206	3,235
Bourne	6.9%	202	2,948
Cleveleys Park	7.1%	158	2,213
Breck	7.4%	155	2,083
Brock with Catterall	7.5%	146	1,950
Pilling	8%	86	1,076
Pharos	10.3%	268	2,608
Mount	11.2%	262	2,349
Warren	12.8%	254	1,991
Rossall	23.5%	608	2,590
Park	29.5%	614	2,081

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

24 mapped electoral wards · May 2026. The same wards are available in the named list below. These are council boundaries, not police neighbourhoods.

Choose a ward

These are electoral wards or the explicitly labelled statistical equivalents. They do not necessarily match villages, parishes or police neighbourhoods.