Skip to content
Lancashire Counts — Lancashire, in numbers.Local help →
Lancashire Counts / Council areas / Burnley / Cliviger with Worsthorne

Cliviger with Worsthorne · Burnley

Cliviger with Worsthorne: your neighbourhood

Cliviger with Worsthorne electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

People aged 65 or over: 31.9% here, compared with 17.9% across Burnley (14 percentage points higher).

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Homes rented privately: 11% here, compared with 24% across Burnley (13.2 percentage points lower).

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages: 11.7% here, compared with 24.8% across Burnley (13.1 percentage points lower).

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

31.9%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

1,615 out of 5,064.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

4.9%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

246 out of 5,068.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

5,070

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

5,070 out of 5,070.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

34.3%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

1,515 out of 4,422.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

43.9%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

1,008 out of 2,298.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

11.7%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

270 out of 2,298.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

45.5%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

2,004 out of 4,401.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

52.6%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

2,315 out of 4,401.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

2.7%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

119 out of 4,401.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

14.9%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

657 out of 4,422.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

11%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

256 out of 2,298.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

37.1%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

1,632 out of 4,401.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

3%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

58 out of 2,298.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

1.9%

21 March 2021 · Cliviger with Worsthorne

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

82 out of 4,401.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for Cliviger with Worsthorne ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

224 mapped crimes

September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 165 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

Cliviger with Worsthorne ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 13 mapped crimes in September 2024; 31 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Cliviger with Worsthorne
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 2024135
October 202482
November 2024111
December 2024130
January 2025104
February 2025125
March 2025134
April 202596
May 2025223
June 2025233
July 2025227
August 202595
September 2025238
October 2025161
November 2025203
December 2025155
January 2026152
February 2026102
March 2026147
April 2026122
May 2026184
June 2026212
July 2026292
August 2026313
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · Cliviger with Worsthorne
CategoryMapped crimes
shoplifting66
violent crime59
burglary27
criminal damage arson21
vehicle crime21
other theft9
public order9
other crime4
robbery3
bicycle theft3
drugs1
theft from the person1
What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.

An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across Burnley →